Information Matrix
Filter
Posts feedReviewing forecasts
When making projections and forecasts, it can be instructive to compare them with what actually happened. In December 2002 the CMI published projections of mortality improvements that incorporated the so-called "cohort effect" (CMIB, 2002). These projections were in use by life offices and pension schemes in the United Kingdom from 2003 onwards.
Weighing the evidence
S2 mortality tables
No smoking without fire
Benchmarking VaR for longevity trend risk
Longevity and the 2011 Census
The Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) has just announced its decision to postpone the release of its mortality projection model until 2013, the main reason being to properly allow for the impact of the 2011 Census.
2D or not 2D?
The Society of Actuaries (SOA) in North America recently published an exposure draft of a proposed interim mortality-improvement basis for pension-scheme work. The new basis will be called "Scale BB" and is intended as an interim replacement for "Scale AA". Like Scale AA, the interim Scale BB is one-dimensional in age, i.e. mortality improvements vary by age and gender only. However, the SOA is putting North American actuaries on notice that a move to a two-dimensional projection is on the cards:
Caveat emptor
Order, order!
Mortality improvements can be analysed in a number of ways. A common desire is to want to separate mortality improvements into components for period and cohort. However, this is much trickier than it seems, as we shall show here. In particular, the order in which calculations are performed can be very important.