The Poisson assumption under the microscope

If you read almost any paper on modelling mortality you will find the assumption that the number of deaths follows the Poisson distribution.

References:

Written by:
Publication Date:
Last Updated:
Services:

Some points for integration

The survivor function from age \(x\) to age \(x+t\), denoted \({}_tp_x\) by actuaries, is a useful tool in mortality work. As mentioned in one of our earliest blogs, a basic feature is that the expected time lived is the area under the survival curve, i.e. the integral of \({}_tp_x\). This is easy to express in visual terms, but it often requires numerical integration if there is no closed-form expression for the integral of the survival curve.

References:

Written by:
Publication Date:
Last Updated:
Services:
Tags:

Simulating the Future

This blog has two aims: first, to describe how we go about simulation in the Projections Toolkit; second, to emphasize the important role a model has in determining the width of the confidence interval of the forecast.

References:

Written by:
Publication Date:
Last Updated:
Services:
Tags:

Over-dispersion

Actuaries need to project mortality rates into the far future for calculating present values of pension and annuity liabilities. In an earlier post Stephen wrote about the advantages of stochastic projection methods. One method we might try is the two-dimensional P-spline method with the simple assumption that the number of deaths at age i in year j follows a Poisson distribution (Brouhns, et al, 2002). Figure 1 shows observed and fitted log mortalities for the cross-section of the

References:

Written by:
Publication Date:
Last Updated:
Services:
Tags:
Subscribe to Projections Toolkit