Information Matrix
Filter Information matrix
Posts feedThe Hermite model of mortality
In Richards (2012) I compared seventeen different parametric models for modelling the mortality of a portfolio of UK annuitants. The best-fitting model, i.e. the one with the lowest AIC, was the Makeham-Beard model:
\[\mu_x = \frac{e^\epsilon+e^{\alpha+\beta x}}{1+e^{\alpha+\rho+\beta x}}\qquad(1)\]
The Poisson assumption under the microscope
The cohort effects that never were
Mortality down under
Is your mortality model frail enough?
Mortality at post-retirement ages has three apparent stages:
Diabetes in the driving seat?
See You Later, Indicator
A recurring feature in my previous blogs, such as this one on information, is the indicator process:
\[Y^*(x)=\begin{cases}1\quad\mbox{ if a person is alive at age \(x^-\)}\\0\quad\mbox{ otherwise}\end{cases}\]
where \(x^-\) means immediately before age \(x\) (never mind the asterisk for now). When something keeps cropping up in any branch of mathematics or statistics, there are usually good reasons, and this is no exception. Here are some:
Compare and contrast: VaR v. CTE
Up close and intimate with the APCI model
This blog brings together two pieces of work. The first is the paper we presented to the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, "A stochastic implementation of the APCI model for mortality projections", which will appear in the British Actuarial Journal. The second is a previous blog where I examined the role of constraints in models of mortality.